Access to Academic Materials for Post-Secondary Students with Print Disabilities
APPENDIX 3: CROSS-OVER SECTION
In the conclusion we referred to several ‘cross-over’ questions that contained identical, or very similar wording. The purpose of these questions was to compare the responses given by both the service providers and the students. A complete list of these questions is contained in table 41 below.
Topic | Question # in Service Prov | Question # in Student | Comments |
Institution | 1 | 4 | Identical |
Province | 2 | 5 | Identical |
Training | 14 | 26 | Service Provider: training in Production of AFs, students: in use of AFs and technology. |
Which AFs required | 16 | 15 | Identical |
Provision of AFs | 17 | 16 | Service Provider: which AFs successfully provided, Students: currently provided by institution |
Copyright: rights | 18 | 30 | Identical |
Copyright: responsibilities | 19 | 31 | Identical |
Complete AF versions | 22 | 19 | Identical |
Barriers | 26 | 22 | Although structured differently, similar info |
Info. In AF | 31 | 29 | Identical |
Quality | 10 | 33 | Service Provider: quality of in-house production. Students: quality of materials received. |
Rate best, worst experiences | 32 | 34 | Identical |
Improvements | 32 | 34 | Identical |